English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The posterior contralateral negativity as a temporal indicator of visuo-spatial processing

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons20109

Wolber,  Maren
Max Planck Research Group Cognitive Psychophysiology of Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20086

Wascher,  Edmund
Max Planck Research Group Cognitive Psychophysiology of Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Wolber, M., & Wascher, E. (2005). The posterior contralateral negativity as a temporal indicator of visuo-spatial processing. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(3), 182-194. doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.182.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-E2B1-3
Abstract
The temporal segmentation of the processing stream between stimulus and response is a declared aim of many EEG-studies on cognitive processing. This goal, however, can only be reached when measures of high temporal sensitivity are available that are unequivocally assigned to a particular cognitive process. The present study evaluates the peak latency of the posterior contralateral negativity (PCN) as a temporal measure of visual spatial processing. In three experiments, we show systematic variability of the PCN latency with task demands. In visual search, PCN latency varied in the same direction as response times with the number of distractors. These effects, however, were smaller than the effects observed on response times, indicating that the process underlying the PCN might contribute to but did not determine response time effects. In contrast, in attentional cueing tasks and a stimulus localization task, where stimulus detection was the primarily addressed process, PCN latency varied to the same amount as manual response times. Thus, it is suggested that the latency of the PCN provides a reliable and valid temporal measure of target localization.