English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Achieving spatial coherence in German sign language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons146

Perniss,  Pamela M.
Language and Cognition Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Categories across Language and Cognition, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Language in our Hands: Sign and Gesture, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

perniss_2007_achieving.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Perniss, P. M. (2007). Achieving spatial coherence in German sign language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua, 117(7), 1315-1338. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.013.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1C55-0
Abstract
Spatial coherence in discourse relies on the use of devices that provide information about where referents are and where events take place. In signed language, two primary devices for achieving and maintaining spatial coherence are the use of classifier forms and signing perspective. This paper gives a unified account of the relationship between perspective and classifiers, and divides the range of possible correspondences between these two devices into prototypical and non-prototypical alignments. An analysis of German Sign Language narratives of complex events investigates the role of different classifier-perspective constructions in encoding spatial information about location, orientation, action and motion, as well as size and shape of referents. In particular, I show how non-prototypical alignments, including simultaneity of perspectives, contribute to the maintenance of spatial coherence, and provide functional explanations in terms of efficiency and informativeness constraints on discourse.