Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes in language 
production

Schiller, Niels O.; Costa, Albert

doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1201

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes in language production

MPS-Authors

Schiller, Niels O.
Language Production Group Levelt, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Utterance Encoding, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Schiller_2006_different.pdf
(Publisher version), 66KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Schiller, N. O., & Costa, A. (2006). Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1201-1207. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1201.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1B4B-1

Abstract

Freestanding and bound morphemes differ in many (psycho)linguistic aspects. Some theorists have claimed that the representation and retrieval of freestanding and bound morphemes in the course of language production are governed by similar processing mechanisms. Alternatively, it has been proposed that both types of morphemes may be selected for production in different ways. In this article, the authors first review the available experimental evidence related to this topic and then present new experimental data pointing to the notion that freestanding and bound morphemes are retrieved following distinct processing principles: freestanding morphemes are subject to competition, bound morphemes not.