The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral 
morphological, and central orthographic effects

De Jong, Nivja H.; Feldman, Laurie B.; Schreuder, Robert; Pastizzo, Matthew; Baayen, R. Harald

doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2547

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects

MPS-Authors

De Jong, Nivja H.
Pioneer, external;
Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

Schreuder, Robert
Interfacultaire Werkgroep Taal- en Spraakgedrag, external;
Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

Baayen, R. Harald
Pioneer, external;
Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

dejong_2002_processing.pdf
(出版社版), 65KB

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

De Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81(1-3), 555-567. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2547.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1B14-C

要旨

In this study, we use the association between various measures of the morphological family and decision latencies to reveal the way in which the components of Dutch and English compounds are processed. The results show that for constituents of concatenated compounds in both languages, a position-related token count of the morphological family plays a role, whereas English open compounds show an effect of a type count, similar to the effect of family size for simplex words. When Dutch compounds are written with an artificial space, they reveal no effect of type count, which shows that the differential effect for the English open compounds is not superficial. The final experiment provides converging evidence for the lexical consequences of the space in English compounds. Decision latencies for English simplex words are better predicted from counts of the morphological family that include concatenated and hyphenated but not open family members.