Some notes on priming, alignment, and self-monitoring [Commentary]

Schiller, Niels O.; De Ruiter, Jan Peter

doi:10.1017/S0140525X0441005X

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Some notes on priming, alignment, and self-monitoring [Commentary]

MPS-Authors

Schiller, Niels O.
Language Production Group Levelt, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Utterance Encoding , MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons49301

De Ruiter, Jan Peter
Language and Cognition Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Multimodal Interaction, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Schiller_2004_some notes.pdf
(Publisher version), 58KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Schiller, N. O., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2004). Some notes on priming, alignment, and self-monitoring [Commentary]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 208-209. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0441005X.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1730-A

Abstract

Any complete theory of speaking must take the dialogical function of language use into account. Pickering & Garrod (P&G) make some progress on this point. However, we question whether their interactive alignment model is the optimal approach. In this commentary, we specifically criticize (1) their notion of alignment being implemented through priming, and (2) their claim that self-monitoring can occur at all levels of linguistic representation.