Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Evolution of the biosynthetic pathway for cyanogenic glucosides in Lepidoptera

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons4231

Vogel,  Heiko
Department of Entomology, Prof. D. G. Heckel, MPI for Chemical Ecology, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Zagrobelny, M., Jensen, M. K., Vogel, H., Feyereisen, R., & Bak, S. (2018). Evolution of the biosynthetic pathway for cyanogenic glucosides in Lepidoptera. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 86, 379-394. doi:10.1007/s00239-018-9854-8.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-E0E3-1
Zusammenfassung
Cyanogenic glucosides are widespread defence compounds in plants, and they are also found in some arthropods, especially within Lepidoptera. The aliphatic linamarin and lotaustralin are the most common cyanogenic glucosides in Lepidoptera, and they are biosynthesised de novo, and/or sequestered from food plants. Their biosynthetic pathway was elucidated in the burnet moth, Zygaena filipendulae, and consists of three enzymes: two cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP405A2 and CYP332A3, and a glucosyl transferase, UGT33A1. Heliconius butterflies also produce linamarin and lotaustralin and have close homologs to CYP405A2 and CYP332A3. To unravel the evolution of the pathway in Lepidoptera, we performed phylogenetic analyses on all available CYP405 and CYP332 sequences. CYP332 sequences were present in almost all Lepidoptera, while the distribution of CYP405s among butterflies and moths was much more limited. Negative purifying selection was found in both CYP enzyme families, indicating that the biosynthesis of CNglcs is an old trait, and not a newly evolved pathway. We compared CYP405A2 to its close paralog, CYP405A3, which is not involved in the biosynthetic pathway. The only significant difference between these two enzymes is a smaller substrate binding pocket in CYP405A2, which would make the enzyme more substrate specific. We consider it likely that the biosynthetic pathway of CNglcs in butterflies and moths have evolved from a common pathway, perhaps based on a predisposition for detoxifying aldoximes by way of a CYP332. Later the aldoxime metabolising CYP405s evolved, and a UGT was recruited into the pathway to establish de novo biosynthesis of CNglcs.