English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Testing the limits of identity recognition with mixed-identity faces

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons83840

Bülthoff,  I
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Project group: Recognition & Categorization, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84435

Zhao,  M
Project group: Recognition & Categorization, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bülthoff, I., & Zhao, M. (2018). Testing the limits of identity recognition with mixed-identity faces. Poster presented at 18th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2018), St. Pete Beach, FL, USA.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-7DEA-C
Abstract
Similarly to how we look for telltale signs of both parents’ facial features in their children’s faces, we are able to recognize two identities from one photo that mixes two persons’ faces together. When more people’s faces are used to create mixed faces, the identities of individual faces (i.e., “parent” faces) become less recognizable (i.e., identity information is degraded). In our study, we investigated the limit of identity recognition in such identity-degraded faces and whether familiarity with the “parent” faces enhances identity recognition from such mixed faces. We first tested whether people can extract the identities from a mix of three faces. Participants who were familiar with the “parent” faces performed better than those who were not. We then tested whether participants can extract the identities of mixed faces generated with more faces. We showed a mixed face of 2 to 10 “parent” faces together with a test face. Participants had to decide whether the test face was a parent of the mixed face. Both familiar and unfamiliar participants performed better than chance for mixed faces generated with up to eight faces. Finally, we tested at what level mixed faces lose their identity so that we cannot discern between two mixed faces generated with completely different “parent” faces. We presented two mixed faces in a trial and participants performed a same/different task. Both mixed faces had the same number of identities (2 to 32), but had no parents in common. Participants were better than chance even for the 32-face mixed faces. Together, these results indicate that our face processing system is extremely sensitive to facial identity information. Familiarity helps identity recognition, but this advantage becomes less evident when identity information degrades (i.e., with increased number of “parent” faces in a mixed face).