English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Water Formation under Silica Thin Films: Real‐Time Observation of a Chemical Reaction in a Physically Confined Space

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons179553

Prieto,  Mauricio
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons32777

Klemm,  Hagen
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

Gottlob,  Daniel M.
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21866

Menzel,  Dietrich
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;
Physik-Department E20, Technical University München;

/persons/resource/persons22076

Schmidt,  Thomas
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21524

Freund,  Hans-Joachim
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Prieto, M., Klemm, H., Xiong, F., Gottlob, D. M., Menzel, D., Schmidt, T., et al. (2018). Water Formation under Silica Thin Films: Real‐Time Observation of a Chemical Reaction in a Physically Confined Space. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 57(28), 8749-8753. doi:10.1002/anie.201802000.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-50BD-0
Abstract
Using low energy electron microscopy and local photoelectron spectroscopy, we investigated the water formation from adsorbed O and H2 on a Ru(0001) surface covered with a vitreous SiO2 bilayer (BL) and compared it to the same reaction on bare Ru(0001). In both cases the reaction is characterized by moving reaction fronts. The reason for this might be related with the requirement of site release by O adatoms for further H2 dissociative adsorption. We find apparent activation energies (Eaapp) for the front motion of 0.59 eV without cover and 0.27 eV under cover. We suggest that the smaller activation energy but higher reaction temperature for SiO2 BL covered Ru(0001) surface is due to a change of the rate‐determining step. Other possible effects of the cover are discussed. Our results give the first values for Eaapp in confined space, thus leading to potentially new approaches of physical confinement effects on reaction rates, including theoretical modelling.