English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Predominant patterns of splicing evolution on human, chimpanzee and macaque evolutionary lineages

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons86803

Xiong,  Jieyi
Chinese Academy of Sciences-Max Planck Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons73430

Jiang,  Xi
Chinese Academy of Sciences-Max Planck Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons72783

Khaitovich,  Philipp
Chinese Academy of Sciences-Max Planck Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;
Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Xiong, J., Jiang, X., Ditsiou, A., Gao, Y., Sun, J., Lowenstein, E. D., et al. (2018). Predominant patterns of splicing evolution on human, chimpanzee and macaque evolutionary lineages. Human Molecular Genetics, 27(8), 1474-1485. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy058.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-3B5F-4
Abstract
Although splicing is widespread and evolves rapidly among species, the mechanisms driving this evolution, as well as its functional implications, are not yet fully understood. We analyzed the evolution of splicing patterns based on transcriptome data from five tissues of humans, chimpanzees, rhesus macaques and mice. In total, 1526 exons and exon sets from 1236 genes showed significant splicing differences among primates. More than 60% of these differences represent constitutive-to-alternative exon transitions while an additional 25% represent changes in exon inclusion frequency. These two dominant evolutionary patterns have contrasting conservation, regulation and functional features. The sum of these features indicates that, despite their prevalence, constitutive-to-alternative exon transitions do not substantially contribute to long-term functional transcriptome changes. Conversely, changes in exon inclusion frequency appear to be functionally relevant, especially for changes taking place in the brain on the human evolutionary lineage.