Structural priming is not a Royal Road to representations. Commentary on 
Branigan and Pickering "An experimental approach to linguistic representation"

Meyer, Antje S.

doi:10.1017/S0140525X1700053X

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

Structural priming is not a Royal Road to representations. Commentary on Branigan and Pickering "An experimental approach to linguistic representation"

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons1167

Meyer, Antje S.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations;
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

Meyer_2017.pdf
(出版社版), 2MB

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Meyer, A. S. (2017). Structural priming is not a Royal Road to representations. Commentary on Branigan and Pickering "An experimental approach to linguistic representation". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40:. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1700053X.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-3603-C

要旨

Branigan & Pickering (B&P) propose that the structural priming paradigm is a Royal Road to linguistic representations of any kind, unobstructed by in fl uences of psychological processes. In my view, however, they are too optimistic about the versatility of the paradigm and, more importantly, its ability to provide direct evidence about the nature of stored linguistic representations.