Romania: Europeanisation of Good Governance: Where and Why Does It Fail, and 
What Can Be Done About It?

Mendelski, Martin

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Please note that a newer version of this item is available:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_2503174_3

DetailsSummary

Released

Contribution to Collected Edition

Romania: Europeanisation of Good Governance: Where and Why Does It Fail, and What Can Be Done About It?

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons199539

Mendelski, Martin
Politische Ökonomie der europäischen Integration, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://intranet/bib/PuRe/Chapter/mpifg_am17_68.pdf
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Mendelski, M. (2017). Romania: Europeanisation of Good Governance: Where and Why Does It Fail, and What Can Be Done About It? In A. Mungiu-Pippidi, & J. Warkotsch (Eds.), Beyond the Panama Papers: The Performance of EU Good Governance Promotion (pp. 68-78). Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-321C-B

Abstract

What impact does the European Union (EU) have on the development of good governance in Romania? Does EU conditionality facilitate or hinder the transition towards good governance? This brief policy-oriented chapter argues that the EU’s promotion of good governance in Romania leads to some selective progress but, overall, to the persistence of bad governance. In particular, the paper shows that Romania’s process of Europeanisation has resulted in 1. some progress across three dimensions of governance (substantive legality, capacity and efficiency/effectiveness) but 2. regress in three others (formal legality, impartiality and coherence). In other words, reforms generate more substantive laws that are adapted to international/European standards (best practices), but at the same time the new laws become instable, incoherent (contradictory), hardly enforced and less general. In addition, reforms improve capacity (inputs) and partly efficiency (outputs) or effectiveness (outcomes) but undermine the procedural and structural aspects of government quality (impartiality, coherence), for instance through increased politicisation and fragmentation of the state structures. Overall, the analysis suggests that there is no transition towards good governance in Romania, despite selective progress.