Building robust age models for speleothems: A case-study using coeval twin 
stalagmites

Benson, Alexa; Hoffmann, Dirk L.; Bella, Pavel; Drury, Anna Joy; Hercman, Helena; Atkinson, Timothy C.

doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2017.10.004

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Please note that a newer version of this item is available:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_2498862_5

DetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Building robust age models for speleothems: A case-study using coeval twin stalagmites

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons192500

Benson, Alexa
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;
The Leipzig School of Human Origins (IMPRS), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons136243

Hoffmann, Dirk L.
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Benson_Building_QuatGeo_2017.pdf
(Preprint), 754KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Benson, A., Hoffmann, D. L., Bella, P., Drury, A. J., Hercman, H., & Atkinson, T. C. (2018). Building robust age models for speleothems: A case-study using coeval twin stalagmites. Quaternary Geochronology, 43, 83-90. doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2017.10.004.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-2B7A-A

Abstract

We use the uranium-series (U-Th) dating method to investigate the accuracy of a relative chronology based on laminae correlation between a pair of coeval twin stalagmites and compare their stable isotope and trace element records based on the two chronologies. U-Th dating shows that a relative chronology based on laminae correlation can be inaccurate: a hiatus in one of the stalagmites was not recognised, as well as more subtle changes in growth rates. Use of the stratigraphic correlation alone resulted in significant differences in the timing of stable isotopes and trace element peaks, with implications for their interpretation. Our results reveal the importance of a robust and direct chronology with which to interpret proxy data. Poor relative chronologies can lead to a misinterpretation of palaeoclimate data. The study reveals potential implications for speleothem records where proxy data and samples for dating were not taken in close proximity to each other and/or were correlated via laminae over distances of more than a few centimetres.