English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Spatial analysis of ocular dominance patterns in monocularly deprived cats

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons208190

Schmidt,  K. E.
Cortical Function and Dynamics Group, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons141798

Singer,  W.
Neurophysiology Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons208083

Löwel,  S.
Neurochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schmidt, K. E., Stephan, M., Singer, W., & Löwel, S. (2002). Spatial analysis of ocular dominance patterns in monocularly deprived cats. Cerebral Cortex, 12(8), 783-796.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-1FAD-8
Abstract
Monocular deprivation during a critical period in postnatal development leads to a shift in functional and anatomical ocular dominance at the expense of the deprived eye. We analyzed the complete two-dimensional pattern of [H-3]proline- labeled afferents in primary visual cortex (area 17) of cats monocularly deprived of vision at eye opening. Substantial shrinkage of deprived eye territory in favor of the normal eye extended into optic disc and monocular segment representations. However, small domains of deprived eye afferents were distributed evenly over the entire visual field representation. Interestingly, normal and deprived eye afferents overlapped extensively in the ipsilateral and in the peripheral contralateral visual field representation of the deprived eye, so that ipsi- and contralateral ocular dominance patterns are not at all complementary. We suggest that this could be the result of both an earlier maturation of crossed versus uncrossed visual pathways and of a maturational gradient within area 17 leading to a lower vulnerability of the central visual field representation to monocular deprivation. Quantitative analysis, using a triangulation algorithm which confirmed previously described larger spacing of adjacent ocular dominance columns in strabismic cats, revealed no difference in spacing of ocular dominance domains in area 17 between monocularly deprived and normals cats. In addition, column spacing was very similar in the same animal and in littermates, indicating that the genetic influence on columnar layout is stronger than previously assumed.