English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

How small could a pup sound? The physical bases of signaling body size in harbor seals

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons201698

Ravignani,  Andrea
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Veterinary & Research Department, Sealcentre Pieterburen;
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel;

Gross,  Stephanie
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover;

Rubio-Garcia,  Ana
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

zox026.pdf
(Publisher version), 491KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ravignani, A., Gross, S., Garcia, M., Rubio-Garcia, A., & De Boer, B. (2017). How small could a pup sound? The physical bases of signaling body size in harbor seals. Current Zoology, 63(4), 457-465. doi:10.1093/cz/zox026.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-572F-4
Abstract
Vocal communication is a crucial aspect of animal behavior. The mechanism which most mammals use to vocalize relies on three anatomical components. First, air overpressure is generated inside the lower vocal tract. Second, as the airstream goes through the glottis, sound is produced via vocal fold vibration. Third, this sound is further filtered by the geometry and length of the upper vocal tract. Evidence from mammalian anatomy and bioacoustics suggests that some of these three components may covary with an animal’s body size. The framework provided by acoustic allometry suggests that, because vocal tract length (VTL) is more strongly constrained by the growth of the body than vocal fold length (VFL), VTL generates more reliable acoustic cues to an animal’s size. This hypothesis is often tested acoustically but rarely anatomically, especially in pinnipeds. Here, we test the anatomical bases of the acoustic allometry hypothesis in harbor seal pups Phoca vitulina. We dissected and measured vocal tract, vocal folds, and other anatomical features of 15 harbor seals post-mortem. We found that, while VTL correlates with body size, VFL does not. This suggests that, while body growth puts anatomical constraints on how vocalizations are filtered by harbor seals’ vocal tract, no such constraints appear to exist on vocal folds, at least during puppyhood. It is particularly interesting to find anatomical constraints on harbor seals’ vocal tracts, the same anatomical region partially enabling pups to produce individually distinctive vocalizations.