English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Towards a Quality Metric for Dense Light Fields

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons180686

Adhikarla,  Vamsi Kiran
Computer Graphics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons180939

Vinkler,  Marek
Computer Graphics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons205171

Sumin,  Denis
Computer Graphics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons45095

Myszkowski,  Karol
Computer Graphics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons45449

Seidel,  Hans-Peter
Computer Graphics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons44312

Didyk,  Piotr
Computer Graphics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

arXiv:1704.07576.pdf
(Preprint), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Adhikarla, V. K., Vinkler, M., Sumin, D., Mantiuk, R. K., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.-P., et al. (2017). Towards a Quality Metric for Dense Light Fields. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.07576.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-2C2C-1
Abstract
Light fields become a popular representation of three dimensional scenes, and there is interest in their processing, resampling, and compression. As those operations often result in loss of quality, there is a need to quantify it. In this work, we collect a new dataset of dense reference and distorted light fields as well as the corresponding quality scores which are scaled in perceptual units. The scores were acquired in a subjective experiment using an interactive light-field viewing setup. The dataset contains typical artifacts that occur in light-field processing chain due to light-field reconstruction, multi-view compression, and limitations of automultiscopic displays. We test a number of existing objective quality metrics to determine how well they can predict the quality of light fields. We find that the existing image quality metrics provide good measures of light-field quality, but require dense reference light- fields for optimal performance. For more complex tasks of comparing two distorted light fields, their performance drops significantly, which reveals the need for new, light-field-specific metrics.