English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Dual-tasking in language: Concurrent production and comprehension interfere at the phonological level

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons197051

Fairs,  Amie
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons49585

Bögels,  Sara
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations;
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1167

Meyer,  Antje S.
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Fairs_poster_A0portrait.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Fairs, A., Bögels, S., & Meyer, A. S. (2017). Dual-tasking in language: Concurrent production and comprehension interfere at the phonological level. Poster presented at Experimental Psychology Society Meeting, Belfast.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-0922-2
Abstract
Conversation often involves simultaneous production and comprehension, yet little research has investigated whether these two processes interfere with one another. We tested participants’ ability to dual-task with production and comprehension tasks. Task one (production task) was picture naming. Task two (comprehension task) was either syllable identification (linguistic condition) or tone identification (non-linguistic condition). The two identification tasks were matched for difficulty. Three SOAs (50ms, 300ms, and 1800ms) resulted in different amounts of overlap between the production and comprehension tasks. We hypothesized that as production and comprehension use similar resources there would be greater interference with concurrent linguistic than non-linguistic tasks. At the 50ms SOA, picture naming latencies were slower in the linguistic compared to the non-linguistic condition, suggesting that the resources required for production and comprehension overlap more in the linguistic condition. As the syllables were non-words without lexical representations, this interference likely occurs primarily at the phonological level. Across all SOAs, identification RTs were longer in the linguistic condition, showing that such phonological interference percolates through to the comprehension task, regardless of SOA. In sum, these results demonstrate that concurrent access to the phonological level in production and comprehension results in measurable interference in both speaking and comprehending.