English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Assessing the amorphousness and periodicity of common domain boundaries in silica bilayers on Ru(0 0 0 1)

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons133830

Burson,  Kristen
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;
Department of Physics, Hamilton College;

/persons/resource/persons21408

Büchner,  Christin
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21628

Heyde,  Markus
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21524

Freund,  Hans-Joachim
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Burson, K., Büchner, C., Heyde, M., & Freund, H.-J. (2017). Assessing the amorphousness and periodicity of common domain boundaries in silica bilayers on Ru(0 0 0 1). Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(3): 035002. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/29/3/035002.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002C-352F-8
Abstract
Domain boundaries are hypothesized to play a role in the crystalline to amorphous transition. Here we examine domain boundary structures in comparison to crystalline and amorphous structures in bilayer silica grown on Ru(0 0 0 1). Atomically resolved scanning probe microscopy data of boundaries in crystalline bilayer films are analyzed to determine structural motifs. A rich variety of boundary structures including rotational, closed-loop, antiphase, and complex boundaries are identified. Repeating units with ring sizes of 558 and 57 form the two most common domain boundary types. Quantitative metrics are utilized to assess the structural composition and degree of order for the chemically equivalent crystalline, domain boundary, and amorphous structures. It is found that domain boundaries in the crystalline phase show similarities to the amorphous phase in their ring statistics and, in some cases, in terms of the observed ring neighborhoods. However, by assessing order and periodicity, domain boundaries are shown to be distinct from the glassy state. The role of the Ru(0 0 0 1) substrate in influencing grain boundary structure is also discussed.