English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Does a Local Bias Exist in Equity Crowdfunding? The Impact of Investor Types and Portal Design

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons196400

Hornuf,  Lars
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons194724

Schmitt,  Matthias
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hornuf, L., & Schmitt, M. (2016). Does a Local Bias Exist in Equity Crowdfunding? The Impact of Investor Types and Portal Design.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002A-E934-3
Abstract
We use hand-collected data of 20,460 investment decisions and two distinct portals to analyze whether investors in equity crowdfunding direct their investments and portfolios to local firms. The results suggest that investors exhibit a local bias, even when controlling for family and friends. In addition to the regular crowd, our sample includes angel investors who invest considerable amounts and exhibit a larger local bias. By contrast, well-diversified investors are less likely to suffer from this behavioral anomaly. The data further show that portal design is important for attracting investors more prone to having a local bias. Finally, firms engaging in equity crowdfunding overcome funding barriers by attracting investors at all distances. These findings corroborate regulation targeted to specific investor groups, advise managers of equity crowdfunding portals about their business model, and inform individual investors of their biases.