English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Correlations and signatures of criticality in neural population models

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons192652

Nonnenmacher,  M
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83801

Berens,  P
Research Group Computational Vision and Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83805

Bethge,  M
Research Group Computational Vision and Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84066

Macke,  J
Research Group Computational Vision and Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Nonnenmacher, M., Behrens, C., Berens, P., Bethge, M., & Macke, J. (2015). Correlations and signatures of criticality in neural population models.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002A-4488-B
Abstract
Large-scale recording methods make it possible to measure the statistics of neural population activity, and thereby to gain insights into the principles that govern the collective activity of neural ensembles. One hypothesis that has emerged from this approach is that neural populations are poised at a thermodynamic critical point [1], and that this may have important functional consequences. Support for this hypothesis has come from studies [2,3] that identified signatures of criticality (such as a divergence of the specific heat with population size) in the statistics of neural activity recorded from populations of retinal ganglion cells. What mechanisms can explain these observations? Do they require the neural system to be fine-tuned to be poised at the critical point, or do they robustly emerge in generic circuits [4,5,6]? We show that indicators for thermodynamic criticality arise in a simple simulation of retinal population activity, and without the need for fine-tuning or adaptation. Using simple statistical models [7], we demonstrate that peak specific heat grows with population size whenever the (average) correlation is independent of the number of neurons. The latter is always true when uniformly subsampling a large, correlated population. For weakly correlated populations, the rate of divergence of the specific heat is proportional to the correlation strength. This predicts that neural populations would be strongly correlated if they were optimized to maximize specific heat, which is in contrast with theories of efficient coding that make the opposite prediction. Our findings suggest that indicators for thermodynamic criticality might not require an optimized coding strategy, but rather arise as consequence of subsampling a stimulusdriven neural population.