English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Cryo-EM of ribosomal 80S complexes with termination factors reveals the translocated Cricket Paralysis Virus IRES

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons50431

Mielke,  Thorsten
Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Charite – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
Microscopy and Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Head: Thorsten Mielke), Scientific Service (Head: Christoph Krukenkamp), Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Muhs.pdf
(Publisher version), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Muhs, M., Hilal, T., Mielke, T., Skabkin, M. A., Sanbonmatsu, K. Y., Pestova, T. V., et al. (2015). Cryo-EM of ribosomal 80S complexes with termination factors reveals the translocated Cricket Paralysis Virus IRES. Molecular Cell, 57(3), 422-432. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.016.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0029-A9AE-7
Abstract
The cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) uses an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) to hijack the ribosome. In a remarkable RNA-based mechanism involving neither initiation factor nor initiator tRNA, the CrPV IRES jumpstarts translation in the elongation phase from the ribosomal A site. Here, we present cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps of 80S⋅CrPV-STOP ⋅ eRF1 ⋅ eRF3 ⋅ GMPPNP and 80S⋅CrPV-STOP ⋅ eRF1 complexes, revealing a previously unseen binding state of the IRES and directly rationalizing that an eEF2-dependent translocation of the IRES is required to allow the first A-site occupation. During this unusual translocation event, the IRES undergoes a pronounced conformational change to a more stretched conformation. At the same time, our structural analysis provides information about the binding modes of eRF1 ⋅ eRF3 ⋅ GMPPNP and eRF1 in a minimal system. It shows that neither eRF3 nor ABCE1 are required for the active conformation of eRF1 at the intersection between eukaryotic termination and recycling.