English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Evolution of the shape of the raindrop size distribution in simulated shallow cumulus

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons73304

Naumann,  Ann Kristin
Hans Ertel Research Group Clouds and Convection, The Atmosphere in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society, Bundesstraße 53, 20146 Hamburg, DE,;
IMPRS on Earth System Modelling, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

jas-d-15-0263%2E1.pdf
(Publisher version), 3MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Naumann, A. K., & Seifert, A. (2016). Evolution of the shape of the raindrop size distribution in simulated shallow cumulus. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 73, 2279-2297. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-15-0263.1.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-5536-F
Abstract
In this paper, the evolution of the raindrop size distribution (RSD) is investigated for two isolated shallow cumulus clouds that are modeled with large-eddy simulations. For a two-moment bulk rain microphysics scheme that assumes the RSD to follow a gamma distribution, it is shown that the evolution of the rainwater content of an individual shallow cumulus cloud—in particular, its subcloud-layer rainwater amount and its surface precipitation rate—is highly sensitive to the choice of the shape parameter of the gamma distribution. To further investigate the shape of the RSD, a Lagrangian drop model is used to represent warm rain microphysics without a priori assumptions on the RSD. It is found that the shape parameter is highly variable in space and time and that existing closure equations, which are established from idealized studies of more heavily precipitating cases, are not appropriate for shallow cumulus. Although a relation of the shape parameter to the mean raindrop diameter is also found for individual shallow cumulus clouds, this relation differs already for the two clouds considered. It is therefore doubtful whether a two-moment scheme with a diagnostic parameterization of the shape parameter (i.e., a local closure in space and time) can be sufficient, especially when being applied across different cloud regimes. A three-moment bulk rain microphysics scheme is able to capture the general development of the relation of the shape parameter to the mean raindrop diameter for the two simulated clouds but misses some relevant features.