English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Covalence and Ionicity in MgAgAs-Type Compounds

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons126532

Bende,  David
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons126626

Grin,  Yuri
Juri Grin, Chemical Metal Science, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons126896

Wagner,  Frank R.
Frank Wagner, Chemical Metal Science, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bende, D., Grin, Y., & Wagner, F. R. (2014). Covalence and Ionicity in MgAgAs-Type Compounds. Chemistry - A European Journal, 20(31), 9702-9708. doi:10.1002/chem.201400299.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0023-CA7C-B
Abstract
MgAgAs-type "half-Heusler" compounds are known to realize two out of three possible atomic arrangements of this structure type. The number of transition metal components typically determines which of the alternatives is favored. On the basis of DFT calculations for all three variants of 20 eight-and eighteen-valence-electron compounds, the experimentally observed structural variant was found to be determined by basically two different bonding patterns. They are quantified by employing two complementary position-space bonding measures. The Madelung energy E-M(QTAIM) calculated with the QTAIM effective charges reflects contributions of the ionic interactions to the total energy. The sum of nearest-neighbor delocalization indices zeta(nn) characterizes the covalent interactions through electron sharing. With the aid of these quantities, the energetic sequence of the three atomic arrangements for each compound is rationalized. The resulting systematic is used to predict a scenario in which an untypical atomic arrangement becomes most favorable.