English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons4432

San Roque,  Lila
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons4391

Kendrick,  Kobin H.
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1648

Norcliffe,  Elisabeth
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons18

Brown,  Penelope
Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1169

Defina,  Rebecca
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons42

Dingemanse,  Mark
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1182

Dirksmeyer,  Tyko
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons51

Enfield,  N. J.
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
University of Sydney;

/persons/resource/persons4352

Floyd,  Simeon
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons4564

Rossi,  Giovanni
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1223

Tufvesson,  Sylvia
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1215

Van Putten,  Saskia
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Syntax, Typology, and Information Structure, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons119

Majid,  Asifa
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Radboud University;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

SanRoque_etal_2015.3.pdf
(Publisher version), 581KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., et al. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26, 31-60. doi:10.1515/cog-2014-0089.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-001A-0906-1
Abstract
To what extent does perceptual language reflect universals of experience and cognition, and to what extent is it shaped by particular cultural preoccupations? This paper investigates the universality~relativity of perceptual language by examining the use of basic perception terms in spontaneous conversation across 13 diverse languages and cultures. We analyze the frequency of perception words to test two universalist hypotheses: that sight is always a dominant sense, and that the relative ranking of the senses will be the same across different cultures. We find that references to sight outstrip references to the other senses, suggesting a pan-human preoccupation with visual phenomena. However, the relative frequency of the other senses was found to vary cross-linguistically. Cultural relativity was conspicuous as exemplified by the high ranking of smell in Semai, an Aslian language. Together these results suggest a place for both universal constraints and cultural shaping of the language of perception.