English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Nearly compensated exchange in the dimer compound callaghanite Cu2Mg2(CO3)(OH)6⋅2H2O

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons126724

Lebernegg,  Stefan
Chemical Metal Science, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons126888

Tsirlin,  Alexander A.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons126671

Janson,  Oleg
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons126819

Rosner,  Helge
Helge Rosner, Physics of Correlated Matter, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lebernegg, S., Tsirlin, A. A., Janson, O., & Rosner, H. (2014). Nearly compensated exchange in the dimer compound callaghanite Cu2Mg2(CO3)(OH)6⋅2H2O. Physical Review B, 89(16): 165127, pp. 1-11. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.165127.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-9089-C
Abstract
A combined theoretical and experimental study of the natural Cu2+ -mineral callaghanite is presented. Its crystal structure features well separated Cu-2(OH)(6) structural dimers with weakly bonded carbonate groups and water molecules in between. Susceptibility, field-dependent magnetization and specific-heat measurements reveal a compound with a small spin gap of about 7 K. The observed magnetic properties are well described by a model of isolated antiferromagnetic spin dimers. Possible ferromagnetic interactions between the dimers amount to -1.5 K, at most. Different flavors of electronic structure calculations have been employed to locate the magnetic dimers in the crystal structure, i.e., to determine whether they coincide with the structural dimers or not. Calculations of the coupling between the structural dimers clearly show that magnetic and structural dimers are the same. For the intradimer coupling, however, the computational results confirmed a coupling strength close to zero but the sign of the coupling could not be determined unambiguously. Based on this finding, we then discuss how the reliability of the numerical methods depends on the characteristics of exchange pathways and on structural features of the compound in general. Eventually, we try to provide a minimum coupling strength that is needed for a reliable computational description.