A cross-linguistic perspective on the acquisition of manner of articulation 
contrasts in the productions of Dutch and German children

Altvater-Mackensen, Nicole; Fikkert, Paula

doi:10.1080/10489223.2014.892945

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Zur Ablage hinzufügen

Bitte beachten Sie, dass eine neuere Version dieses Datensatzes verfügbar ist:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_1896979_6

DetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

A cross-linguistic perspective on the acquisition of manner of articulation contrasts in the productions of Dutch and German children

MPG-Autoren

/persons/resource/persons96512

Altvater-Mackensen, Nicole
Max Planck Research Group Early Social Development, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen

Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)

Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Altvater-Mackensen, N., & Fikkert, P. (2015). A cross-linguistic perspective on the acquisition of manner of articulation contrasts in the productions of Dutch and German children. Language Acquisition, 22(1), 2-39. doi:10.1080/10489223.2014.892945.

Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-F5EB-5

Zusammenfassung

The present article investigates the acquisition of Manner of Articulation (MoA) contrasts in child language production. We analyzed spontaneous longitudinal speech data of four German and six Dutch 1- to 3-year-olds. The data suggest that the acquisition of MoA contrasts is influenced by various co-occurrence constraints at the word level. Interestingly, developmental patterns are very similar across languages. However, children seem to follow different strategies to introduce MoA contrasts: They either introduce MoA contrasts in word-initial position in monosyllables as well as in disyllables, or they introduce MoA contrasts in noninitial position in both types of words. We couch the data in a lexical framework assuming that early lexical representation fits templates that evolve in the course of development.