English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Comment on "On the subtleties of searching for dark matter with liquid xenon detectors"

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons30560

Hampel,  Wolfgang
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30647

Kaether,  Florian
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30766

Lindemann,  Sebastian
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30768

Lindner,  Manfred
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons73111

Marrodan Undagoitia,  Teresa
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons31012

Schreiner,  Jochen
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons31050

Simgen,  Hardy
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons31159

Weber,  Marc
Division Prof. Dr. Manfred Lindner, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

1208.5762.pdf
(Preprint), 197KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

The XENON Collaboration, Aprile, E., Alfonsi, M., Arisaka, K., Arneodo, F., Balan, C., et al. (2012). Comment on "On the subtleties of searching for dark matter with liquid xenon detectors". Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5762.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-A7FB-8
Abstract
In a recent manuscript (arXiv:1208.5046) Peter Sorensen claims that XENON100's upper limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for WIMP masses below 10 GeV "may be understated by one order of magnitude or more". Having performed a similar, though more detailed analysis prior to the submission of our new result (arXiv:1207.5988), we do not confirm these findings. We point out the rationale for not considering the described effect in our final analysis and list several potential problems with his study.