English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Optical properties of the uropygial gland secretion: no evidence for UV cosmetics in birds

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

EXT097.pdf
(Publisher version), 204KB

Supplementary Material (public)

EXT097s1.doc
(Supplementary material), 2MB

Citation

Delhey, K., Peters, A., Biedermann, P., & Kempenaers, B. (2008). Optical properties of the uropygial gland secretion: no evidence for UV cosmetics in birds. Die Naturwissenschaften, 95(10), 939-946. doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0406-8.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-509C-A
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) reflectance of the plumage is common in birds and plays an important role in sexual signalling. Recently, it has been proposed that birds are able to modify plumage UV reflectance by the application of uropygial gland secretion. Based on a survey of the optical properties of this secretion from 51 species belonging to 12 avian orders, we show that two main types of uropygial secretions exist, one predominantly found in passerines and one in non-passerines, both reducing relative UV reflectance of a white background (Teflon (TM) tape). We quantified how each type of secretion (exemplified by blue tit and mallard) affected feather UV reflectance. Both secretions reduced overall brightness and relative UV reflectance of white mallard feathers but hardly affected the reflectance of UV/blue blue tit crown feathers. According to models of avian colour vision, changes in reflectance due to application of the secretion were at or below the discrimination threshold of most birds. We conclude that the uropygial secretion is unlikely to play a major role in modifying plumage UV reflectance. However, the optical properties of the uropygial secretion may have been selected to interfere as little as possible with visual signaling through plumage reflectance.