Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Reply to Gewald: Isolated Himba settlements still exist in Kaokoland [Letter to the editor]

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons1171

Sauter,  Disa
Comparative Cognitive Anthropology, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
University College London, Birkbeck College;

/persons/resource/persons50

Eisner,  Frank
University College London, Birkbeck College;
Adaptive Listening, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Sauter, D., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Reply to Gewald: Isolated Himba settlements still exist in Kaokoland [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(18), E76. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002264107.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-418B-2
Zusammenfassung
We agree with Gewald (1) that historical and anthropological accounts are essential tools for understanding the Himba culture, and these accounts are valuable to both us and him. However, we contest his claim that the Himba individuals in our study were not culturally isolated. Gewald (1) claims that it would be “unlikely” that the Himba people with whom we worked had “not been exposed to the affective signals of individuals from cultural groups other than their own” as stated in our paper (2). Gewald (1) seems to argue that, because outside groups have had contact with some Himba, this means that these events affected all Himba. Yet, the Himba constitute a group of 20,000-50,000 people (3) living in small settlements scattered across the vast Kaokoland region, an area of 49,000 km2 (4).