The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a "Social Market 
Economy"

Scharpf, Fritz W.

doi:10.1093/ser/mwp031

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Please note that a newer version of this item is available:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_1231981_8

DetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a "Social Market Economy"

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons41288

Scharpf, Fritz W.
Globale Strukturen und ihre Steuerung, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp031
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

SER_8_2010_Scharpf.pdf
(Any fulltext), 351KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Scharpf, F. W. (2010). The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a "Social Market Economy". Socio-Economic Review, 8(2), 211-250. doi:10.1093/ser/mwp031.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-418C-9

Abstract

Judge-made law has played a crucial role in the process of European integration. In the vertical dimension, it has greatly reduced the range of autonomous policy choices in the member states, and it has helped to expand the reach of European competences. At the same time, however, ‘integration through law’ does have a liberalizing and deregulatory impact on the socio-economic regimes of European Union member states. This effect is generally compatible with the status quo in liberal market economies, but it tends to undermine the institutions and policy legacies of Continental and Scandinavian social market economies. Given the high consensus requirements of European legislation, this structural asymmetry cannot be corrected through political action at the European level.