Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey

There are no MPG-Authors available
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Rowland, H. M., Speed, M. P., Ruxton, G. D., Edmunds, M., Stevens, M., & Harvey, I. F. (2007). Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey. Animal Behaviour, 74(5), 1249-1258. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.030.

Cite as:
Of the many traits seen in cryptic prey animals, countershading (darker pigmentation on those surfaces exposed to the most lighting) is one of the commonest, and paradoxically one of the least understood. Countershading has been hypothesized to enhance crypsis by shadow-obliteration, in which lighter coloration on the undersides compensates for increased shadow in these regions, thus reducing detection by visually hunting predators. We tested the hypothesis that countershading enhances crypsis in two experiments with artificial prey presented to free-living birds. In the first experiment, artificial prey were presented on lawns to a range of bird species. In the second experiment, the prey were presented on green boards to individual blackbirds, Turdus merula. In both experiments countershaded prey had significantly lower levels of predation than controls. Our results show that countershading can enhance cryptic protection and has important implications for the evolutionary ecology of prey defences. (C) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.