de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Impressum Kontakt Einloggen
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Bericht

Bottleneck behavior in CNF formulas

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons44632

Hoffmann,  Jörg
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

MPI-I-2005-2-001.ps
(beliebiger Volltext), 471KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Hoffmann, J., Gomes, C., & Selman, B.(2005). Bottleneck behavior in CNF formulas (MPI-I-2005-2-001). Saarbrücken: Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-6849-3
Zusammenfassung
Recent research has revealed that CNF formulas encoding applications often contain very small backdoors, i.e. subsets of variables branching over which suffices to decide satisfiability with a DPLL procedure. We shed light on what kinds of problem structure {\em cause} the existence of such small backdoors. We examine carefully crafted synthetic domains, clean enough to allow a rigorous analysis of DPLL search spaces, yet meaningful enough to allow conclusions about more practical domains. The synthetic CNF encodings are parameterized not only in their size, but also by a structure parameter controlling the extent of an intuitive bottleneck behavior in the underlying task. We investigate the size of the smallest possible backdoors as a function of the structure parameter. We prove upper bounds that, in certain cases, decrease {\em exponentially} in that parameter. We empirically verified the upper bounds as lower bounds in formulas small enough for full empirical exploration, and we conjecture that the upper bounds are exact in general. We present empirical results indicating that our notion of bottleneck behavior is relevant not only in our synthetic domains, but also in more practical domains.