de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Is the landing response of the housefly (Musca) driven by motion of a flow field?

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84306

Wehrhahn,  C
Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Wehrhahn, C., Hausen, K., & Zanker, J. (1981). Is the landing response of the housefly (Musca) driven by motion of a flow field? Biological Cybernetics, 41(2), 91-99. doi:10.1007/BF00335364.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-F0C3-1
Abstract
The landing response of tethered flying housefliesMusca domestica elicited by motion of periodic gratings is analysed. The field of view of the compound eyes of a fly can be subdivided into a region of binocular overlap and a monocular region. In the monocular region the landing response is elicited by motion from front to back and suppressed by motion from back to front. The sensitivity to front to back motion in monocular flies (one eye covered with black paint) has a maximum at an angle 60°–80° laterally from the direction of flight in the equatorial plane. The maximum of the landing response to front to back motion as a function of the contrast frequencyw/λ is observed at around 8 Hz. In the region of binocular overlap of monocular flies the landing response can be elicited by back to front motion around the equatorial plane if a laterally positioned pattern is simulataneously moved from front to back. 40° above the equatorial plane in the binocular region the landing response in binocular flies is elicited by upward motion, 40° below the equatorial plane in the binocular region it is elicited by downward motion. The results are interpreted as an adaptation of the visual system of the fly to the perception of a flow field having its pole in the direction of flight.