de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Mechanosensory control of compensatory head roll during flight in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala Meig

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83962

Hengstenberg,  R
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hengstenberg, R. (1988). Mechanosensory control of compensatory head roll during flight in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala Meig. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 163(2), 151-165. doi:10.1007/BF00612425.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-EF61-6
Abstract
In the blowflyCalliphora flying stationarily in a wind tunnel, compensatory head movements were elicited by rolling the fly about its longitudinal axis (Fig. 1). Responses were recorded on video tape, and evaluated by single frame analysis. Active head movements were observed in response to visual and mechanosensory stimuli (Fig. 2). They are not made or caused by the head's inertial momentum (Fig. 11). Gravity, used by walking flies to align their head with the vertical, does not seem to be perceived during flight (Figs. 3–6) but has a passive stabilizing effect upon the flight attitude (Fig. 7). A difference in aerodynamical load of the two wings elicits a transient head roll partly compensating a banked attitude (Figs. 4–6). The majority of campaniform sensilla at the wing base seems suitable to measure wing load. Steady roll motion elicits a steady compensatory head roll which does not vanish even after 8 min of rotation at constant angular velocity (Fig. 8). Roll motion is most efficient at high roll speeds (100‡/s<w<2000‡/s). Mechanical motion perception fails if both halteres are disabled by arresting their oscillation or by amputation of the haltere knobs (Fig. 11). Flies with only one haltere intact cannot distinguish pitch from roll, but with respect to the sense of rotation they still respond bidirectionally (Fig. 12). Haltere dynamics and the response characteristics of haltere sensilla are discussed on the basis of recent results. Head/body coordination is demonstrated in the absence of any roll stimulus (Fig. 3 a). The role of resilience of the neck skeleton, and that of different neck sense organs are discussed. Mechanosensory roll control inCalliphora depends upon the locomotor state: When walking, the fly aligns its head vertically by gravity perception (Horn 1982). When flying, it controls only fast rotations. Passive attitude stabilization and visual means of control are required to maintain an upright flight attitude and head orientation.