English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84990

Franz,  VH
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83926

Gegenfurtner,  KR
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Franz, V., Gegenfurtner, K., Bülthoff, H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11(1), 20-25. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00209.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E569-2
Abstract
Neuropsychological studies prompted the theory that the primate visual system might be organized
into two parallel pathways, one for conscious
perception and one for guiding action. Supporting
evidence in healthy subjects seemed to come from a
dissociation in visual illusions: In previous
studies, the Ebbinghaus (or Titchener) illusion
deceived perceptual judgments of size, but only
marginally influenced the size estimates used in
grasping. Contrary to those results, the findings
from the present study show that there is no
difference in the sizes of the perceptual and
grasp illusions if the perceptual and grasping
tasks are appropriately matched. We show that the
differences found previously can be accounted for
by a hitherto unknown , nonadditive effect in the
addition. We conclude that the illusion does not
provide evidence for the existence of two distinct
pathways for perception and action in the visual
system.