de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Talk

Do we keep track of where we've been or what we've done?

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84258

Thornton,  IM
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Horowitz, T., & Thornton, I. (2000). Do we keep track of where we've been or what we've done?. Talk presented at 23rd European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 2000). Groningen, Netherlands.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E49A-B
Abstract
We explored the interaction between visual search, memory, and action using a simple visuomotor task. Stimuli were eight light-grey disks (targets; ~1 deg diameter) on a medium-grey background. Targets were numbered 1 - 8, and placed randomly within a 12 deg × 11.5 deg rectangle. The task was to move a mouse pointer to each target and click on it in numerical order, as quickly as possible, starting with number 1. Twelve subjects performed 60 trials in each of two conditions: vanish -- each target was removed from the screen after the subject clicked on it; no change -- clicking on a target did not change the display. Reaction time (RT) decreased roughly linearly by 22.89 ms per item with each response (not counting RT to the first target). There was no effect of condition, nor an interaction. We conclude that all targets initially compete at some level to control responses. Each response completely eliminates that target from competition. In a further study, we attempted to separate retrospective (what you did) and prospective (what you will do) elements of the task. We did this by scrambling items ahead of the current target after each response. Preliminary results suggest prospective memory may be driving the decrease in RT.