de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Impressum Kontakt Einloggen
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Poster

Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation: Comparison with masking by light

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84149

Puls,  K
Former Department Comparative Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84000

Kammer,  T
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Former Department Comparative Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Puls, K., & Kammer, T. (2000). Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation: Comparison with masking by light. Poster presented at 23rd European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 2000), Groningen, Netherlands.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E490-0
Zusammenfassung
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the occipital pole is able to suppress the perception of visual stimuli. This suppression is based on a shift of the perception threshold. Here we compared the modulatory effect of a light flash with the suppression effect of TMS. Subjects had to report the orientation of a flashed hook. At two different adaptation levels (0.3 and 3 cd m-2) we determined contrast thresholds by the method of constant stimuli. A light flash (15 or 150 cd m-2 for the different adaptation levels) was applied with different SOAs after the appearance of the hook, and threshold shifts were measured. Similarly, threshold shifts due to focal TMS with SOAs from -25 to +195 ms were measured. With high background intensity, TMS shifted thresholds up to 1.2 Weber contrast units (WC), and with low background intensity the shift was up to 6.6 WC. Latency for the maximal effect was shorter at the high background level (85 ms SOA) than at the lower level (115 ms SOA). We found similar effects on threshold shifts with light flashes at SOAs from 20 to 80 ms. Our results suggest that the masking effect of TMS might share similar mechanisms with a masking effect by light.