de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

A comparison of pursuit eye movement and perceptual performance in speed discrimination

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83926

Gegenfurtner,  KR
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Gegenfurtner, K., Hawken, M., & Scott, B. (2000). A comparison of pursuit eye movement and perceptual performance in speed discrimination. Poster presented at 23rd European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 2000), Groningen, Netherlands.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E483-E
Abstract
A central goal of sensation and perception is to direct our interactions with the environment. During most voluntary motor actions that are driven by sensory input we consciously experience an internal representation of the visual world. This leads to the question how faithful this internal representation is, and how precise our actions are compared to this reference. To answer that question, we studied the relationship between the perceived speed, which is the experiential representation of the stimulus, and the speed of smooth-pursuit eye movements, the motor action. We determined psychophysical thresholds for detecting small perturbations in the speed of Gabor patterns (1 cycle deg-1) moving at a base speed of 4 deg s-1. At the same time we recorded eye-movement traces and used an ideal-observer analysis to compute analogous 'oculometric' thresholds. Our results show a remarkable agreement between perceptual judgments for speed discrimination and the fine gradations in eye-movement speed, with psychophysical and oculometric functions exhibiting the same slope. However, there was no correlation between perceptual errors and eye-movement errors on a trial-by-trial basis. We conclude that the motor system and perception share the same constraints in their analysis of motion signals, but they act independently and have different sources of noise.