Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
  Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben
Zeitschriftenartikel

Distinct mechanisms for the representation of moving and static objects

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons84023

Kourtzi,  Z
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13506280143000421?needAccess=true
(Verlagsversion)

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Kourtzi, Z., & Nakayama, K. (2002). Distinct mechanisms for the representation of moving and static objects. Visual Cognition, 9(1-2), 248-264. doi:10.1080/13506280143000421.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E29E-6
Zusammenfassung
The visual system has been suggested to integrate different views of an object in motion. We investigated differences in the way moving and static objects are represented by testing for priming effects to previously seen ("known") and novel object views. We showed priming effects for moving objects across image changes (e.g. mirror reversals, changes in size, and changes in polarity) but not over temporal delays. The opposite pattern of results was observed for objects presented statically; that is, static objects were primed over temporal delays but not across image changes. These results suggest that representations for moving objects (1) are updated continuously across image changes while static object representations generalize only across similar images and (2) they are more short-lived than static object representations. These results suggest two distinct representational mechanisms; a static object mechanism rather spatially refined and permanent, possibly suited for visual recognition and a motion-based object mechanism more temporary and less spatially refined, possibly suited for visual guidance of motor actions.