English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Effects of the Ebbinghaus Illusion on grasping in a virtual environment

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84238

Stockmeier,  K
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84990

Franz,  VH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

pdf1325.pdf
(Any fulltext), 254KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Stockmeier, K., Bülthoff, H., & Franz, V. (2002). Effects of the Ebbinghaus Illusion on grasping in a virtual environment. Poster presented at 25th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 2002), Glasgow, UK.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-DF52-7
Abstract
It is an open question whether the Ebbinghaus (or Titchener) illusion affects perception more than grasping. Evidence for a stronger effect on perception has often been based on a perceptual task called 'manual estimation'. We compared manual estimation to a standard perceptual measure as well as to grasping. Virtual target discs (diameter: 38, 40, or 42 mm), surrounded by small or large discs (diameter: 10 or 58 mm) were displayed stereoscopically on a monitor, generating the Ebbinghaus illusion. In the grasping task, ten participants grasped the target. Haptic feedback was simulated by two robot arms (PHANToM ™). In the manual-estimation task, participants indicated the size of the target using index finger and thumb (without seeing their fingers). In the standard perceptual task, they adjusted a comparison to match the target. We found illusion effects on manual estimation (2.3 mm, SE 0.45 mm) which were larger than both the grasp effects (1.1 mm, SE 0.29 mm) as well as the effects on the standard perceptual measure (0.7 mm, SE 0.11 mm). This suggests that manual estimation shows relatively large illusion effects.