English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Poster

Perceiving and controlling simulated ego-rotations by optic flow: Influence of field of view (FOV) and display devices on ego-motion perception

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84199

Schulte-Pelkum,  J
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84170

Riecke,  BE
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84287

von der Heyde,  M
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://www.opam.net/archive/opam2002/OPAM2002Abstracts.pdf
(Abstract)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schulte-Pelkum, J., Riecke, B., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2002). Perceiving and controlling simulated ego-rotations by optic flow: Influence of field of view (FOV) and display devices on ego-motion perception. Poster presented at 10th Annual Workshop on Object Perception and Memory (OPAM 2002), Kansas City, KS, USA.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-DEAD-5
Abstract
This study investigated humans ability to control simulated ego-rotations from optic flow. The stimuli consisted of limited lifetime dots on a dark background. In a within-subject design, performance was tested using a curved projection screen (FOV 86°×63°), a HMD (40°×30°), and blinders (40°×30°) that restricted the FOV on the screen. Participants typically undershot intended turn angles. Performance was best with the screen (gain factor 0.77) and worst with the HMD (gain 0.57). A significant difference between blinders (gain 0.73) and HMD indicates that different display devices can influence ego-motion perception differentially, even if the physical FOVs are equal.