English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Learning to Combine Arbitrary Signals from Vision and Touch

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons83906

Ernst,  MO
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

EuroHaptics-2003-Jaekel.pdf
(Any fulltext), 831KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Jäkel, F., & Ernst, M. (2003). Learning to Combine Arbitrary Signals from Vision and Touch. In I. Oakley, S. O'Modhrain, & F. Newell (Eds.), EuroHaptics 2003 (pp. 276-290). Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College Dublin.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-DC20-9
Abstract
When different perceptual signals of the same physical property are integrated–e.g., the size of an object, which can be seen and felt–they form a more reliable sensory estimate [3]. This however implies that the sensory
system already knows which signals belong together and how they are related. In a Bayesian model of cue integration this prior knowledge can be made explicit. Here, we examine whether such a relationship between two arbitrary
sensory signals from vision and touch can be learned from their statistical cooccurrence such that they become integrated. In the Bayesian model this means changing the prior distribution over the stimuli. To this end, we trained subjects with stimuli that are usually uncorrelated in the world–the luminance of an object (visual signal) and its stiffness (haptic signal). In the training phase we
presented only combinations of these signals which were highly correlated. Before and after training we measured discrimination performance with distributions of stimuli which were either congruent with the correlation during
training or incongruent. The incongruent stimuli came from an anti-correlated distribution compared to the stimuli during training. If subjects were sensitive to the correlation between the signals then we would expect to see a change in their prior knowledge about what combinations of stimuli are usually encountered. Accordingly, this should change their discrimination performance
between pre- and post-test. We found a significant interaction between the two factors pre/post-test and congruent/incongruent. After training, discrimination
thresholds for the incongruent stimuli are increased relative to the thresholds for congruent stimuli, suggesting that subjects learned to combine the two signals
effectively.