de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Self-Regulation of local brain activity and its behavioural consequences

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84778

Scharnowski,  F
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Scharnowski, F., Weiskopf N, Bock SW, Mathiak K, Veit R, Rota G, Studer P, Zopf R, Erb M, Goebel, R., & Birbaumer, N. (2004). Self-Regulation of local brain activity and its behavioural consequences. Poster presented at 7th Tübingen Perception Conference (TWK 2004), Tübingen, Germany.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-DA0D-9
Abstract
Compared to brain-computer interfaces (BCI) based on electroencephalography [1], a BCI based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allows to record non-invasively the activity of the whole brain with high spatial resolution. This allows to feed back local brain activity to learn voluntary regulation of a region of interest (ROI). Using real-time fMRI, brain responses were visualized and provided to the subject with a delay of less than 1.5 seconds [2]. As on-line feedback, the difference of the mean BOLD signal of two regions of interest approximating supplementary motor area (SMA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA) was presented [3]. Eight volunteers learned to successfully control the differential neurofeedback signal. While regulating activity in SMA and PPA, three subjects performed behavioural tasks which are known to be characteristic for these regions. Preliminary data suggest that subject's performance systematically changed depending on the self-regulated level of activity in SMA and PPA. During up/down regulation of SMA and PPA, subjects had to carry out an externally triggered bimanual nger sequence. Reaction times, i.e. onset of the movement, correlated negatively with activity in the SMA. Hence, the more the subjects increased activity in the SMA the faster the movement was executed. To test behavioural consequences of regulating the PPA we made use of the fact that it is involved in encoding information for memory. Wagner et al [4] have shown that the higher the activity of the PPA during encoding of visually presented words, the more likely the words were recognized in a memory test. We presented 106 words while subjects regulated activity of SMA and PPA. Interestingly, all subjects remembered the words better in the SMA-up/PPA-down condition than in the SMA-down/PPA-up condition. Possibly, concurring activity in the PPA might occupy resources and, thereby, interfere with other tasks utilizing the same region. Taken together, our data suggest that self-regulation of circumscribed functional areas leads to characteristic behavioural effects. This offers the opportunity to study behaviour dependent on self-regulated brain activity.