de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Visual cues are used to interpret gravito-inertial force

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84928

MacNeilage,  PR
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83802

Berger,  DR
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84889

Banks,  M
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

MacNeilage, P., Berger, D., Banks, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2004). Visual cues are used to interpret gravito-inertial force. Poster presented at Fourth Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2004), Sarasota, FL, USA.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D873-2
Abstract
Humans use visual and non-visual cues to estimate body orientation and self-motion relative to gravity. Non-visual cues include forces acting on the body, which are signaled by the vestibular and somatosensory systems. These cues are ambiguous indicators of the direction of gravitational force because of Einstein's equivalence principle: any linear accelerometer measures the sum of forces. Thus, forces due to gravity and to acceleration are confounded. Visual cues to body orientation and self-motion relative to gravity could resolve the ambiguity. Optic flow is the primary visual cue to self-motion. It could be used to estimate self-acceleration, and thereby estimate the component of the vestibular-somatosensory signal caused by acceleration as opposed to gravity. Additional visual cues to body orientation include environmental features that have a fixed orientation with respect to gravity, such as the horizon. Using a 6-df motion platform with a large visual display, we examined whether visual cues are used to disambiguate the vestibular-somatosensory signal. We presented different combinations of vestibular-somatosensory signals (by pitching the platform) and visual cues (acceleration specified by optic flow and orientation by horizon pitch) and asked observers to make judgments about perceived body orientation and perceived forward acceleration. They reported in which of two intervals they were more pitched and in which they were more accelerated. Vestibular-somatosensory and horizon pitch affected orientation and acceleration judgments. Optic flow affected acceleration judgments but not orientation judgments. We present a computational model of how cues may be combined to derive separate estimates of gravity and other inertial forces.