de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Impressum Kontakt Einloggen
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Poster

Judging Size by Hand: No Benefit for Bimanual Estimates

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84038

Lange,  C
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Research Group Multisensory Perception and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Research Group Multisensory Perception and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83906

Ernst,  MO
Research Group Multisensory Perception and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Lange, C., & Ernst, M. (2005). Judging Size by Hand: No Benefit for Bimanual Estimates. Poster presented at 8th Tübingen Perception Conference (TWK 2005), Tübingen, Germany.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D64B-C
Zusammenfassung
When redundant sources of sensory information are available, integrating these sources is beneficial for a system in order to decrease the perceptual noise and so to increase the accuracy of the overall percept [1]. However, a potential cost may come from incorrect binding of the different sources, which will generally evoke perceptual illusions [2]. Here we ask whether humans take advantage of a bimanual size estimate originating from an object of constant size. The stimulus was a cylindrical object that subjects felt with their left and right hand simultaneously. To display the bimanual haptic stimulus we used two PHANToM force-feedback devices and measured size discrimination performance using a 2IFC paradigm. Subjects’ task was to decide which of two bimanual stimuli was bigger. From the resulting psychometric functions we determined the JND for bimanual vs unimanual size discrimination and the point of subjective equality (PSE). There was no difference in the bimanual vs the unimanual JNDs which indicates that subjects did not benefit from having available two size estimates in the bimanual situation. We therefore conclude that there is no integration of size estimates between hands when an object is touched bimanually. We may speculate that this failure of integration to occur results from the fact that naturally the object is touched at slightly different spatial locations and so information is not truly redundant even though subjects were told to touch an object of constant size. Not being able to integrate information that comes from two different spatial locations may help to prevent misbinding of different sensory sources.