Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse





Are there Correlations Between Vertical VOR and Multiaxial Spatial Orientation?


Beykirch,  K
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Beykirch, K., von Lassberg, C., & Krug, J. (2005). Are there Correlations Between Vertical VOR and Multiaxial Spatial Orientation?. Poster presented at 8th Tübingen Perception Conference (TWK 2005), Tübingen, Germany.

Cite as:
Stangl et al. [1] describe differences of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain in groups of athletes accustomed to rotational movements. The authors suggest that the physiological purpose of these differences is to enable better spatial orientation during whole body rotations. Is the reverse possible: to use the VOR gain to estimate an individual’s per-rotatory spatial orientation ability? To answer this question, we looked for differences of the VOR gains in a group of high-performance gymnasts (gym) versus a group of non-athletes (control). The results from the gymnasts were also examined for correlations with a rank of their individual perrotatory spatial orientation (PSO) abilities, performed by their coaches. The subjects’ (gym: n = 9, age: 10–13 years, control: n = 10, age: 11–12 years) eye movements were recorded using a video nystagmography system (SMI). They were seated with head fixed in a software controlled multi-axial whole body rotator. The test included 4 horizontal and 4 vertical sinusoidal whole body rotations with various frequencies and peak velocities (0.4, 0.2 and 0.1 Hz at 25/s; 0.1 Hz at 50/s). VOR gain was calculated as the ratio of the amplitude of the best-fit sine wave for the slow-component eye velocity to the amplitude of the stimulus velocity. The PSO ranking list was based on the independent estimation of three coaches, who work with the group of gymnasts daily. The results showed clear gain differences between the 4 tests (the higher the speed or frequency, the higher the gains). It was not possible to show group differences between groups for either horizontal or during vertical rotations. But there were clear inter-individual differences in both groups, characterized through high significant individual stability (individual correlations between the tests mostly with p<0.01 [Pearson]). All the individual coach rankings showed also significant correlations [p<0.05, Spearman]). The analysis of correlations between vertical gains and PSO showed a clear and significant correlation (0.4Hz: rS=0.647, p=0.109; 0.2Hz: rS=0.786, p=0.036; 0.1Hz@25/s: rS=0.619, p=0.102; 0.1Hz@25/s: rS=0.821, p=0.023). Horizontal motion did not show any correlations with PSO. Differences in VOR gain in subjects accustomed to rotational movements could not be confirmed. Correlations between the various tests for each subject show they are stable indicators of VOR response. Correlations between vertical VOR-gains and PSO of the athletes could indicate a link between VOR parameters and individual per-rotatory multi-axial orientation abilities.