English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84170

Riecke,  B
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84287

von der Heyde,  M
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Riecke, B., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(3), 183-215. doi:10.1145/1077399.1077401.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D511-3
Abstract
"Spatial updating" refers to the process that automatically updates our egocentric mental representation of our
immediate surround during self-motions, which is essential for quick and robust spatial orientation. To investigate
the relative contribution of visual and vestibular cues to spatial updating, two experiments were performed in a
high-end Virtual Reality system. Participants were seated on a motion platform and saw either the surrounding
room or a photorealistic virtual model presented via head-mounted display or projection screen. After upright
rotations, participants had to point "as accurately and quickly as possible" to previously-learned targets that were
outside of the current field of view (FOV). Spatial updating performance, quantified as response time, config-uration
error, and pointing error, was comparable in the real and virtual reality conditions when the FOV was
matched. Two further results challenge the prevailing basic assumptions about spatial updating: First, automatic,
reflex-like spatial updating occurred without any physical motion, i.e., visual motion information from a known
scene alone can indeed be sufficient, especially for large FOVs. Second, continuous motion information is not,
in fact, mandatory for spatial updating - merely presenting static images of new orientations proved sufficient,
motivating our distinction between continuous and instant-based spatial updating.