de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Report

Categorical perception of gender: No evidence for unfamiliar faces

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83840

Bülthoff,  I
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84426

Newell,  FN
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bülthoff, I., & Newell, F.(2005). Categorical perception of gender: No evidence for unfamiliar faces (094).


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D405-D
Abstract
We investigated whether male and female faces are discrete categories at the perceptual level. We created artificial gender continua between male and female faces using a 3D-morphing algorithm and used classical categorization and discrimination tasks to investigate categorical perception of gender. In Experiments 1 and 3, 3D morphs were computed between male and female faces. The results of the discrimination task suggest that the gender of unfamiliar faces is not categorically perceived. When participants were familiarized with the male and female endpoint faces before testing (Experiment 3), a categorical effect was found. In Experiment 2, only shape or texture of unfamiliar 3D morphs was indicative of gender, while other information (e.g. texture or shape) was kept constant. Again there was no evidence of a categorical effect in the discrimination task. In Experiments 1, 2 and 3, changes in the gender of a face were also coupled with changes in identity which may have confounded the findings. In Experiments 4 and 5, we used face continua in which only the gender of the facial features changed, while the characteristic of the facial features remained constant. When the faces were unfamiliar (Experiment 4), there was no evidence of categorical perception of gender. In Experiment 5, participants learned to classify the face images in two gender categories using a feedback procedure. A clear categorical effect for gender was present after training. Our findings suggest that despite the importance of faces, gender information present in faces is not naturally perceived categorically. Consequently participants showed categorical perception of gender only after training with the face stimulus set.