Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Poster

A Model of Theory-Of-Mind Based on Action Prediction

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons84201

Schultz,  J
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Schultz, J., & de Vignemont, J. (2006). A Model of Theory-Of-Mind Based on Action Prediction. Poster presented at 9th Tübingen Perception Conference (TWK 2006), Tübingen, Germany.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D281-3
Zusammenfassung
Theory-of-Mind, or mentalising, is defined as a cognitive process used to understand other peoples’ actions based on mental states. Twomain theories of mentalising have been put forward in
recent years: Simulation Theory and Theory-Theory. We propose a model of mentalising based
on action prediction and semantic representation. The model would be triggered whenever a
human observer detects a potential agent (particularly other humans, but also other animals or
active entities). On the basis of their actions, it would associate a possible mental state to the
observed agent and predict its future behaviour. To do this, first a search engine would look
for a potential mental state matching an observed action in a look-up table containing actionmental
state associations acquired through experience. Then, a predictor would calculate a
possible next action for the observed agent on the basis of the mental state, and a comparator
would compare this predicted action to the actual next action of the agent. If the discrepance
between predicted and actual behaviour is greater than a threshold, the mental state is rejected
and the process repeated until a conclusive match or abandon. The predictor is postulated to be
similar to mechanisms thought to underlie motor learning or reinforcement learning, while the
look-up table could resemble semantic representations of objects or faces.
The model could also be used for active interaction with other agents: the search engine
would find an action to be executed by the observer in order to induce a particular mental state
in the observed agent. Success could be assessed by the model through observation of the other
agents’ reaction.
The neural correlates for this model are likely to be distributed and could include the posterior
part of the superior temporal sulcus, the medial prefrontal cortex, the temporal poles, the
premotor cortex and the cerebellum. To assess the plausibility of the model and test possible
associations between particular neural structures and the components of the model, we review
previous studies of the neural correlates of mentalising and some associated processes.