Comparison of Adaptive Spatial Filters with Heuristic and Optimized Region of 
Interest for EEG Based Brain-Computer-Interfaces

Liefhold, C; Grosse-Wentrup, M; Gramann, K; Buss, M

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74936-3_28

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

会議論文

Comparison of Adaptive Spatial Filters with Heuristic and Optimized Region of Interest for EEG Based Brain-Computer-Interfaces

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-74936-3_28.pdf
(出版社版)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

公開されているフルテキストはありません

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Liefhold, C., Grosse-Wentrup, M., Gramann, K., & Buss, M. (2007). Comparison of Adaptive Spatial Filters with Heuristic and Optimized Region of Interest for EEG Based Brain-Computer-Interfaces. In A., Hamprecht, C., Schnörr, & B., Jähne (Eds.), Pattern Recognition: 29th DAGM Symposium, Heidelberg, Germany, September 12-14, 2007 (pp. 274-283). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-CBD9-3

要旨

Research on EEG based brain-computer-interfaces (BCIs) aims at steering devices by thought. Even for simple applications, BCIs require an extremely effective data processing to work properly because of the low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) of EEG signals. Spatial filtering is one successful preprocessing method, which extracts EEG components carrying the most relevant information. Unlike spatial filtering with Common Spatial Patterns (CSP), Adaptive Spatial Filtering (ASF) can be adapted to freely selectable regions of interest (ROI) and with this, artifacts can be actively suppressed. In this context, we compare the performance of ASF with ROIs selected using anatomical a-priori information and ASF with numerically optimized ROIs. Therefore, we introduce a method for data driven spatial filter adaptation and apply the achieved filters for classification of EEG data recorded during imaginary movements of the left and right hand of four subjects. The results show, that in the case of artifact-free datasets, ASFs with numerically optimized ROIs achieve classification rates of up to 97.7 while ASFs with ROIs defined by anatomical heuristic stay at 93.7 for the same data. Otherwise, with noisy datasets, the former brake down (66.7 ) while the latter meet 95.7 .