Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

Unsupervised Classification for non-invasive Brain-Computer-Interfaces

MPG-Autoren
Es sind keine MPG-Autoren in der Publikation vorhanden
Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Automed-Workshop-2007-GrosseWentrup.pdf
(beliebiger Volltext), 121KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Eren, S., Grosse-Wentrup, M., & Buss, M. (2007). Unsupervised Classification for non-invasive Brain-Computer-Interfaces. In R. Tita (Ed.), Automatisierungstechnische Verfahren für die Medizin: 7. Workshop (pp. 65-66). Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI Verlag.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-CB95-C
Zusammenfassung
Non-invasive Brain-Computer-Interfaces (BCIs) are devices that infer the intention of human subjects from
signals generated by the central nervous system and
recorded outside the skull, e.g., by electroencephalography
(EEG). They can be used to enable basic communication
for patients who are not able to communicate by
normal means, e.g., due to neuro-degenerative diseases
such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (see
[Vaughan2003] for a review).
One challenge in research on BCIs is minimizing the
training time prior to usage of the BCI. Since EEG
patterns vary across subjects, it is usually necessary to
record a number of trials in which the intention of the
user is known to train a classifier. This classifier is
subsequently used to infer the intention of the BCI-user.
In this paper, we present the application of an
unsupervised classification method to a binary noninvasive
BCI based on motor imagery. The result is a
BCI that does not require any training, since the
mapping from EEG pattern changes to the intention of
the user is learned online by the BCI without any
feedback. We present experimental results from six
healthy subjects, three of which display classification
errors below 15. We conclude that unsupervised BCIs
are a viable option, but not yet as reliable as supervised
BCIs.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In the
Methods section, we first introduce the experimental
paradigm. This is followed by a description of the
methods used for spatial filtering, feature extraction,
and unsupervised classification. We then present the
experimental results, and conclude the paper with a
brief discussion.